This is a Christian inspirational site. Bethelstone suggests a touchstone where believers can find inspiration and engage meaningfully to help all of us make better sense of our common faith

Friday, January 22

Practical Christianity 6: A new wineskin


Mahatma Ghandi said, “to a hungry child, a loaf of bread is God”.

I have certainly always felt that children acquire their concept of God from their fathers. If he is hard, aloof, inaccessible, we translate that to God. What a responsibility to model right ideas in the lives of our children - because they aspire to what they see, not what they hear.

Well, James, the brother of Jesus, was an advocate of a practical faith. He spoke of pure religion, undefiled: one that visits widows and the fatherless. He also said, what Luther considered borderline blasphemy, “faith without works is dead”.

He added, “show me your faith without works and I will show you my faith with my works”. He had many other pithy things to say about how we treat each other, the bridling of the tongue, single-minded prayer as opposed to babblings, and so on.

It may account for his late acceptance of Jesus as His personal redeemer. He was not evident in most of His brother’s life work, but afterwards became an absolute pillar in the Jerusalem church.

He never went on missionary trips nor was he an evangelical powerhouse, but even the greatest of leaders deferred to James. The understated, balanced wisdom he showed in the dispute over circumcision, reveals a very pragmatic mind.

Although Paul advocated grace above most things, in truth his teachings lean into the ideas of James. He taught in Ephesians 4 that we are the body, the physical presence of Jesus, on earth.

The world gets its concept of God, from us. We are the salt of the earth.

Have you seen Jesus? I have. Yep, personally. I saw Him standing in the midst of His people, revealed through the collective. I saw His arms, His hands and His feet, at work in the living stones that make up His house. No church building or religious liturgy could do that for me.

Indeed, Paul argues that in the dynamic of church life we grow up into His fullness and likeness, to the extent that Paul accepts that even ministry is only a means to a greater end, as in “these must continue until we come into the fullness of Christ”.

He argues that if we are rooted and grounded in Jesus we will ultimately grasp the length, depth and height of Christ and know His love in a perfect way.

Those who lead with spirituality, tend to become spiritual hermits, isolated in their holy huddles and somewhat irrelevant – although we have all been there at some stage.

Those who engage the practical framework for this faith, the church, and immerse themselves into its dynamic, will reach a fullness that will be enviable in this fragmented world.

Paul’s teachings on leadership also reflect on a framework. Leaders miss the point when they presume that the church is merely a platform for their scintillating personalities and their silver tongues. That was never Paul’s inference. 

As such, ticking boxes on music, buildings, systems and ministry, absolutely misses the point and detracts from Paul’s objectives.

A division of functions, akin to the separation of powers, in say the US constitutional framework, was part of the wineskin or framework that Paul had in mind.

Thus, for him, elders were intended as gatekeepers and enablers. They should be without conflict of interest, never promote their own ambitions or interest, but objectively govern, keep out wolves and steward our heritage: to enable believers to become a holy priesthood (1 Pet 2:9).

They are the heartbeat of the faith and by that I refer to what others reduced to “laymen”. I absolutely hate the clergy-laity model. It is not biblical at all. If Jesus was willing to be the foundation, thus at the bottom of the pile, leaders belong there too.

In fact Paul also cast the Apostles and Prophets into the foundations of the church. He saw a church with sound foundations built up into a holy habitation for God’s spirit.

The role of ministries, is as distinct from governance and the priesthood, as prophets were from judges or priests in the Old Testament. They do not govern, nor function as priests, but as independent voices of challenge, inspiration and correction.

There is so much to say about all of this, but the point is that both James and Paul saw deeper spirituality starting with a practical framework and growing from there into a fuller expression of the faith to which we swear allegiance.

To believers and the world outside, to the next generation, to young and old, to male and female, Jew and Gentile, Bond and free, Black and White (Galatians 3:28): we are the living evidence of Christ in the world.


If you can get your mind around it, John 17 goes on to imply that Jesus foresaw us becoming an effective extension of the Godhead. Unbelievable.   

(c) Peter Missing: bethelstone@gmail.com

No comments: